Why I don’t have an iPhone

I admit it publicly - I am an Apple fan, who may sometimes be blinded by glam of their products. I really enjoy my Macs and adore my iPod Classic, which holds the whole iTunes library. I was as excited as everyone else when iPhones were announced. But unlike many of bloggers out there, who were running wild to Apple stores worldwide to get their own phone, I still don’t have an iPhone, even if I sincerely think it’s a revolutionary device that changed the landscape of smartphone industry. I can explain why - and some of my reasoning might seem strange for those of you living in big countries with long history of using Apple products.

The most obvious reason that is often mentioned by many bloggers, is abysmal battery life of iPhone. I belong to the camp that thinks one day of standby time is not enough. I like not to bother with chargers for as long time as possible, ideally weeks. I still remember Nokia 5110, which was best Nokia phone ever because of two things - excellent menu, and even better battery life. Battery should last at least three days. Of course, this is my private opinion and many may argue it’s a matter of taste and self-organization, and even if it’s a big discomfort, it can be tolerated in exchange for functionality the device provides.

Other minor thing is impossibility to send MMS. This is plain silly in my opinion. Why it is not possible to send an MMS when device is capable to do much more advanced things?

Putting minor issues aside, the main rant is about distribution of the phone and how different is iPhone real experience in different countries. I don’t really understand why Apple chooses exclusive partners in the countries where their phone is officially distributed. I am not going to trade my operator because of any even most advance phone - why my operator can’t increase iPhone userbase by legally selling phone to me? 

Well, even the last argument could be compromised, given my brand awareness and belief in Apple products’ superiority. But as a real IT geek, I am pissed off by the fact of absence of AppStore in my country. Without possibility to extend phone’s functionality with 3d-party software, the device itself is less useful than its jail-broken variety.

I live in a small country - Estonia - and size of the country is both its advantage and its curse. In terms of variety of goods available the small size is a curse. A lot of cool stuff never gets officially imported, because producers don’t consider our market any significant to put any effort in distributing their goods to this corner of the world. Obviously, the same thing happens in case of Apple’s AppStore (and iTunes Store as well). I might understand that multi-billion dollar company is short on money to create an Estonian version of stores. But why not to allow usage of other stores, but paying with credit card issued by some Estonian bank? When I discussed this with friends, some suggest that Apple has fear of credit card fraud. I dismiss this as a total bullshit - there are countries with much worse history of cybercrimes, who are still enjoying comfort of AppStore and iTunes Store.

Well, on some forums you can find information how to hack this limitation using a backdoor in registration process. But I don’t want to add a semi-legal practice to the list of drawbacks that iPhone already has.

Apple, please, treat all your customers equal - open proper AppStores in all countries where phone is distributed. Otherwise, iPhone will still be more iVanity than anything else. Currently, HTC+Window Mobile is (sic!) much more open platform (in addition to decent look and better battery life), and only their high prices prevent people of prefering them to iPhones, because besides Nokia, there are no real competitiors for these two on the smartphone market of small countries.

Planned languages

One of things that take many of my time is learning and advocating “planned languages”, often also referred to as “artificial”, “international”, “auxiliary” or even “world languages” - depending who and why speaks of them. Technically, they are rather “planned” and “artificial” - just because they appeared not as a result of language evolution, but were created from scratch with certain purpose.

Such purpose can be idealistic - to provide a common and culturally neutral means of communication for the people of the world; in this case they might be referred to as “international” and “auxiliary”. This idealistic component of their existence is what draws most of adherents and attracts most of the critics at the same time. The turbulent history of Esperanto in XX century is just one of the examples, how difficult is to view only at idealistic side of planned language.

Planned languages were also created for aesthetic reasons. Elfs in “Fellowship of the rings” and Klingons of “Star Trek” fame speak languages created by John R. R. Tolkien and Gene L. Coon, respectively. They are also created as scientific experiments - Ro language was created to implement category system to recognize unknown words. Proto-Indo-European is a an attempt to find a common ancestor of indo-european languages, and technically isreconstruction project rather than truly planned language. There are literally hundreds of planned languages around, and most of them are very niche and rarely spoken by more than handful of enthusiasts. This might let us think that all of them are useless toys of bunch of intellectuals or leftist internationists (I mean those who are in “world languages” camp).

Wide public is just unaware or ignorant about existence of planned languages. Call me a rootless idealist, but I am one of those who really think that planned languages are not only underused - they are underestimated. I believe that their scope is much wider than most of us think and we are just in the beginning of understanding their real capabilities. Some might say that 120+ years of existence of Esperanto, of which 100 is a period of decline, prove that the  idea was flawed from the beginning. However, the world has greatly changed over the last century, and new possibilities granted by IT progress give us new areas where planned languages can benefit the humankind.

Now, when the world gets smaller and smaller, when more and more people get online, we are facing more and more intercommunication challenges, for which just one “world language” is not a panacea. It’s also obvious that original idea of a planned language  used globally as first alternative to native language is too optimistic. But still, their planned nature makes them really handy instruments for solving communicating problems. 

Over the years I came to a conclusion that planned languages could be used as a bridge for learning “natural” languages. While learning a planned language, a person understands a system that can be reused for learning other languages, and receives enough confidence to speak and use other language. Many people dismiss the idea of learning foreign languages as too complex. This is because they don’t have enough confidence. Learning other language (lest it be an “artificial” one) easily and rapidly would help them break the stereotype and move towards learning the language they were afraid of.

In this blog, I will publish more thoughts about this, as well as drawing your attention to other helpful resources on the net dedicated to the same subject.

Русская версия

Несмотря на то, что большинство статей на этом сайте будет на английском языке, время от времени я буду публиковать свои мысли на русском языке для русскоязычной аудитории. Поскольку это первый пост по-русски, я коротенько ознакомлю вас с тематикой блога. В первую очередь, этот блог будет отражать моё мнение по поводу туризма, технологий и изучения языков - наиболее интересных для меня самого тем. Если же в мире будут случаться события, о своём отношении к которым я сочту нужным сообщить миру, то, конечно же, я не буду держать это в себе.

Кроме этого блога, я поддерживаю ещё несколько сайтов, как личных, так и предназначенных широкому кругу пользователей. Список сайтов приведён в правом столбике в графе My Sites. Большинство их них многоязычны и/или имеют русскую версию.

Содержимое этого блога доступно также по RSS

Hello world!

Finally I gave up the idea of having my own custom-written Content Management System. At least at the moment, while I have ideas for sites with content, and no time to make my own code usable. And especially when there are so many freely available engines. True, none of them satisfies ALL my needs, but I grew up to compromise it. Even WordPress does not support multilingualism as I see it, but in most cases I can write posts in different languages tagging them with the language name. As I am starting from now.